Connect with us

Politics

Does a potential overturn of Roe v. Wade imperil LGBTQ+ rights?

Alarms were set off in legal circles as some argued that Obergefell v. Hodges – the same-sex marriage decision, would be in danger

Published

on

Protests outside the U.S. Supreme Court December 1, 2021 (Photo by Cathy Renna)

WASHINGTON – The oral arguments before the justices of the United States Supreme Court had barely ended in the case brought by the state of Mississippi defending its law banning abortion after 15 weeks, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, when alarms were set off in legal circles as some argued that Obergefell v. Hodges – the same-sex marriage decision, would be in danger should the high court rule to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Florida State University law professor Mary Ziegler, appearing on NPR’s ‘Heard on All Things Considered,’ told host Mary Louise Kelly that there was a basis for concern on whether the court would actually overrule its precedents in other cases based on the questions and statements raised during the hearing by the conservative members of the court.

Asked by Kelly if she saw a legal door opening Ziegler affirmed that she did. Kelly then asked her; “Them taking up cases to do with that. What about same-sex marriage?”

Ziegler answered, “Yeah, same-sex marriage is definitely a candidate. Justices Alito and Thomas have in passing mentioned in dicta that they think it might be worth revisiting Obergefell v. Hodges – the same-sex marriage decision.

And I think it’s fair to say that in the sort of panoply of culture war issues, that rights for same-sex couples and sexual orientation are still among the most contested, even though certainly same-sex marriage is more subtle than it was and than abortion was.

I think that certainly the sort of balance between LGBTIQ rights and religious liberty writ large is a very much alive issue, and I think some states may try to test the boundaries with Obergefell, particularly knowing that they have a few justices potentially willing to go there with them.”

As almost if to underscore the point raised by Professor Ziegler, during the hearing Wednesday, Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia M. Sotomayor pointed out that the high court has taken and “discerned” certain rights in cases from the Constitution.

Along with abortion, the court has “recognized them in terms of the religion parents will teach their children. We’ve recognized it in their ability to educate at home if they choose,” Sotomayor said. “We have recognized that sense of privacy in people’s choices about whether to use contraception or not. We’ve recognized it in their right to choose who they’re going to marry.”

In following up the cases cited by Justice Sotomayor, Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart, who was defending the state’s abortion law, whether a decision in his favor would affect the legal precedents in those cases cited by Justice Sotomayor.

In his answer to Justice Barrett, the state’s Solicitor General said cases involving contraception, same-sex marriage and sodomy wouldn’t be called into question because they involve “clear rules that have engendered strong reliance interests and that have not produced negative consequences or all the many other negative stare decisis considerations we pointed out.”

However, Lambda Legal Chief Strategy Officer and Legal Director, Sharon McGowan had a different take and interpreted remarks by Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to mean that the decisions in Lawrence v. Texas, which decriminalized private sexual intimacy between same-sex couples, and Obergefell v. Hodges, which struck down remaining bans on the freedom of same-sex couples to marry, would actually justify overturning Roe v. Wade.

In a publicly released media statement McGowan noted:

During today’s argument, Justice Kavanaugh suggested that two key Supreme Court decisions protecting LGBTQ civil rights—Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges—support overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

To that we say, NOT IN OUR NAME. LGBTQ people need abortions. Just as important, those landmark LGBTQ decisions EXPANDED individual liberty, not the opposite. They reflected the growing societal understanding of our common humanity and equality under law.

Just as the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education rejected the lie of ‘separate but equal,’ the Supreme Court’s decisions in Lawrence and Obergefell appropriately overruled precedent where it was clear that, as was true with regard to race, our ancestors failed properly to acknowledge that gender and sexual orientation must not be barriers to our ability to live, love, and thrive free of governmental oppression.

Abortion rights are essential not only because abortion is basic healthcare, but because without access to abortion, people who need that healthcare cannot determine the course of their own lives and participate equally in society. They cannot decide how to structure their families, protect their own health, determine their educational and financial futures, and secure the futures of existing children.

These landmark LGBTQ cases, which Lambda Legal litigated and won, and on which we rely today to protect our community’s civil rights, were built directly on the foundation of Casey and Roe. Our interests in equal dignity, autonomy, and liberty are shared, intertwined, and fundamental.” 

On Sunday, the Blade spoke with Shannon Minter, the Legal Director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, a national LGBTQ+ legal organization which represented three same-sex couples from Tennessee, whose case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court along with Obergefell and two other cases.

Minter is urging caution in how people interpret Wednesday’s arguments and remarks made by the justices.

We should be cautious about taking the bait from anti-LGBTQ groups who falsely argue that if the Supreme Court reverses or undermines Roe v. Wade, they are likely to reverse or undermine Obergefell or Lawrence. In fact, that is highly unlikely, as the argument in Dobbs itself showed,” he said.

The only reason Justice Kavanaugh mentioned Obergefell and Lawrence, along with Brown v. Board of Education, was to cite them as examples of cases in which the Supreme Court clearly did the right thing.  All of those decisions rely at least as strongly on equal protection as on fundamental rights, and even this extremely conservative supreme court has not questioned the foundational role of equal protection in our nation’s constitutional law,” Minter stressed.

During an interview with Bloomberg magazine, David Cortman, of the Scottsdale, Arizona based anti-LGBTQ+ legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, which has been listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an extremist hate group because of its anti-LGBTQ+ stance and public utterances, said “two things in particular distinguish abortion from those other privacy rights: the right to life and the states’ interest in protecting a child.”

Cortman, whose group urged the justices to allow states to ban same-sex marriages, said those other rights may be just as wrong as the right to an abortion. “But the fundamental interest in life that’s at issue in abortion means those other rights are probably not in any real danger of being overturned.”

But Cortman is of the opinion that there is little impetus among the Court’s conservatives to take up challenges to those cases.

However, the fact that the six to three make-up of the high court with a conservative majority which can imperil the rights of women in regards to their ability to render decisions over their healthcare and well-being has progressives’ clamoring for the public to pay closer attention and be more proactively engaged.

Kierra Johnson, Executive Director of the National LGBTQ Task Force, in an emailed media public statement to the Blade underscored those concerns:

Reports and analysis coming out of Wednesday’s Supreme Court hearing on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization are extremely disturbing and represent a threat to our individual constitutional rights to privacy and autonomy. There is no ‘middle ground’ on what the Constitution guarantees and what was decided decades ago with the Roe v Wade decision

This is about liberty, equality, and the rule of law, not the political or partisan views of those sitting on the bench. The unprecedented decision to remove a constitutional right recognized by the Supreme Court 50 years ago would set back civil rights by decades. They cannot take this country back to a time when lives were destroyed or lost because women lived in a state without access to reproductive healthcare or bodily autonomy.

Abortion access is essential, and a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution. Bans on abortion are deeply racist and profoundly sexist – the harshest impacts fall on Black and Brown women and pregnant people and on our families and communities.

If you think this decision will not affect you, think again: a wrong decision by the Supreme Court means you, too, will lose your bodily autonomy, your ability to own your own personal and community power. This is not just about abortion; it is about controlling bodies based on someone else determining your worthiness. This is a racial justice issue. This is a women’s issue. It is an LGBTQ issue. It is a civil rights issue. These are our fundamental rights that are at stake.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Politics

PREVIEW: Biden grants exclusive interview to the Blade, congratulates Sarah McBride

Published

on

President Joe Biden and Christopher Kane in the Oval Office on Sept. 12, 2024 (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Delaware State Sen. Sarah McBride, who is favored to become the first transgender member of Congress after winning the Democratic primary this week, received a congratulatory call on Wednesday from a powerful friend and ally: President Joe Biden.

The president shared details about their conversation with the Washington Blade during an exclusive interview in the Oval Office on Thursday, which will be available to read online early next week.

“I called her and I said, ‘Sarah,’ I said, ‘Beau’s looking down from heaven, congratulating you,’” Biden said, referring to his late son, who had served as attorney general of Delaware before his death from cancer in 2015.

McBride had worked on Beau Biden’s campaign in 2006 and on his reelection campaign in 2010. Two years later, when she came out as transgender, the AG called to say, “I’m so proud of you. I love you, and you’re still a part of the Biden family.”

The president told the Blade that McBride welled with emotion — “she started to fill up” — as she responded that the “‘only reason I’m here is because of Beau. He had confidence in me.’”

When the two worked together, “[Beau] was getting the hell kicked out” of him because “he hired her,” Biden said, but “now she’s going to be the next congresswoman, the next congresswoman from Delaware.”

Later, when asked how he will remain involved in the struggle for LGBTQ rights after leaving office, the president again mentioned McBride. “Delaware used to be a pretty conservative state, and now we’re going to have — Sarah is going to be, I pray to God, a congresswoman.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Harris puts Trump on his heels in high-stakes debate

Little mention of LGBTQ issues during 90-minute showdown

Published

on

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris (Screen capture: CNN/YouTube)

In the presidential debate hosted by ABC News in Philadelphia on Tuesday, Vice President Kamala Harris put Donald Trump on the defensive over issues from foreign policy and the ongoing criminal prosecutions against him to his record and moral character.

The 90-minute exchange featured no discussion of LGBTQ issues, apart from a baseless accusation by Trump that his opponent “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.”

The remark echoed statements Trump has made recently on the campaign trail, for example in Wisconsin on Monday where he said that children are, however implausibly, returning home from school having underwent sex change operations.

Similarly, during the debate the former president asserted without evidence that Democrats favor abortions up to and following delivery, which would amount to infanticide.

“There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born,” interjected ABC News anchor Linsey Davis, a moderator, who then allowed Harris to respond.

“Well, as I said, you’re gonna hear a bunch of lies, and that’s not actually a surprising fact,” the vice president replied before addressing the question at hand, which concerned abortion.

While Harris did not address the matter of “transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison,” viewers on X were quick to mock the comment.

Continue Reading

California Politics

California Senate race: Trans Democrat Lisa Middleton aims for historic win in Inland Empire

Candidate hopes to represent 19th Senate District

Published

on

Lisa Middleton (Courtesy photo)

Democrat Lisa Middleton is the first openly transgender person elected to a non-judicial office in California and is currently running to represent the 19th Senate District in a tight Inland Empire race.

She is one of more than 21 out LGBTQ candidates running for a U.S. congressional, state Senate or state Legislative seat in 2024.

As a longtime leader of the LGBTQ community, Middleton works to protect and advance civil rights. She serves on the Equality California Institute’s board of directors and would become the first openly trans person to serve in the California State Legislature.

Middleton began her transition 30 years ago, but her reputation in politics, fraud investigation and governance started long before. Middleton, 72, is the former mayor of Palm Springs after serving as mayor pro tempore from 2020 to 2021 and then becoming the first openly trans mayor in California, succeeding Christy Holstege in December 2021.

Middleton is the child of blue-collar union workers.

In addition to supporting LGBTQ rights, she also supports projects such as renewable energy using wind and solar, stating that these are win-win solutions that help labor workers and combat climate change.

Middleton is running against GOP Latina Rosilicie Bogh, 52, a former elementary school teacher, school board member, and realtor.

Bogh has publicly opposed bills that boost gender-affirming health care services and protect trans children and their families from being criminalized for seeking treatment in California.

Bogh has also abstained from voting on gay marriage rights in the state constitution and recognizing Pride Month.

She gained attention earlier this year when she stood up to oppose a law that protects educators and school staff from forcibly outing trans children to their families.

Assembly Bill 1955 went into effect earlier this summer after getting support from Gov. Gavin Newsom and backlash from Elon Musk, leading him to withdraw X and SpaceX from California.

The race for this seat is stimulated by newly redrawn district boundaries that now include thousands more registered Democrats.

The new 19th Senate District now spans from Coachella Valley to the San Bernardino Mountains and from the San Jacinto Valley to the High Desert, including highly visited places like Big Bear City, Joshua Tree, and Palm Springs.

The redrawn district includes San Bernardino County, which has Republican strongholds, but also includes the more liberal areas of Riverside County and Palm Springs, totaling around half a million voters.

A Report of Registration released earlier this summer shows that the district is now nearly even in terms of Republican and Democratic support, with 35 percent and 36 percent respectively.

In the March primary election, Bogh won 54 percent of the vote, while Middleton secured 46 percent.

In the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump won the district by a narrow margin.

Both candidates are trailblazers, so who will win over the majority vote in the upcoming election that is only 57 days away?

Both candidates say they’re avoiding culture war clashes to focus on bread-and-butter issues.

For Middleton, the bread-and-butter issues are protecting reproductive care, fixing roads, creating jobs, increasing neighborhood safety, demanding accountability for taxpayers, and building housing to address homelessness.

Middleton markets herself as a neighborhood advocate who provides “common-sense solutions” to the region’s challenges.

Her track record includes working as an auditor for California’s State Compensation Insurance Fund, working her way up to becoming senior vice president of internal affairs and serving as chair of California’s Fraud Assessment Commission.

Her goal in the Legislature is to eliminate wasteful spending of tax dollars.

As mayor of Palm Springs, Middleton led the city’s economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic by helping small businesses reopen and creating well-paying jobs.

Prior to that, Middleton was appointed to the Board of Administrators of the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), which aims to build health and retirement security for California’s state and local school employees. Currently, she serves as chair of the Finance and Administration Committee and vice chair of the Risk and Audit Committee.

Middleton married her wife Cheryl, a now-retired nurse, in 2013, shortly after moving to Palm Springs. Together they have two children who are educators.

Middleton was also included in the 2016 Pride Honors Award at Palm Springs Pride, receiving the Spirit of Stonewall Community Service Award.

Organizations like Planned Parenthood, Reproductive Freedom For All California, National Union of Healthcare Workers, California Women’s List, and others support Middleton.

A list of openly LGBTQ candidates on the California ballot can be found below:

U.S. House of Representatives:

  • Congressional District 16: Evan Low
  • Congressional District 23: Derek Marshall
  • Congressional District 39: Mark Takano
  • Congressional District 41: Will Rollins
  • Congressional District 42: Robert Garcia

California Senate:

  • Senate District 3: Christopher Cabaldon
  • Senate District 11: Scott Wiener
  • Senate District 17: John Laird
  • Senate District 19: Lisa Middleton
  • Senate District 25: Sasha Renee Perez
  • Senate District 31: Sabrina Cervantes

California Assembly:

  • Assembly District 24: Alex Lee
  • Assembly District 47: Christy Holstege
  • Assembly District 51: Rick Chavez Zbur
  • Assembly District 54: Mark Gonzalez
  • Assembly District 57: Sade Elhawary
  • Assembly District 58: Clarissa Cervantes
  • Assembly District 60: Corey Jackson
  • Assembly District 62: José Solache
  • Assembly District 72: Dom Jones
  • Assembly District 78: Chris Ward
Continue Reading

COMMENTARY

LGBTQ representation in corporate leadership crucial, experts say

Experts emphasize economic and cultural benefits of diverse leadership

Published

on

In an era of social and political uncertainty, the importance of LGBTQ representation in corporate leadership has never been more critical, according to diversity experts.

Despite increasing visibility, LGBTQ+ individuals continue to face discrimination and challenges in the workplace. A recent study by GLAAD found that 70% of non-LGBTQ adults believe in the importance of inclusive hiring practices. However, representation in top corporate positions remains inadequate.

“Having LGBTQ+ individuals in C-suite positions is more than an issue of fairness — it drives real cultural change,” said Aidan Currie, Executive Director of Reaching Out MBA.

According to Gallup data, 7.6% of all U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ, with the percentage rising to 22% among Gen Z adults. This demographic shift underscores the need for diverse leadership in corporate America.

The impact of LGBTQ+ representation extends beyond social progress. McKinsey & Company’s 2020 report found that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity were 25% more likely to see higher profitability. Similar principles apply to LGBTQ+ representation.

However, challenges persist. The FBI reports a 19% increase in hate crimes targeting LGBTQ+ people, highlighting ongoing societal issues.

To address these challenges, organizations like Reaching Out MBA (ROMBA) are working to increase LGBTQ+ influence in business. ROMBA’s annual conference brings together LGBTQ+ MBA students, recruiters, and business leaders.

This year, ROMBA is introducing PRIZM, a multi-day event for experienced, mid-career LGBTQ+ business professionals. The event aims to equip participants with skills needed to advance to C-suite roles.

“It’s incumbent upon us to make sure our community is prepared to lead, and it’s incumbent upon corporate leaders to stand behind their commitment to inclusion,” said Zeke Stokes, former Chief Programs Officer at GLAAD.

As the business landscape evolves, the push for greater LGBTQ+ representation in corporate leadership continues. Experts argue that this representation is not just a matter of equity, but a crucial factor in driving innovation, profitability, and positive societal change.

For more information on ROMBA and PRIZM, visit https://reachingoutmba.org/

Written By AIDAN CURRIE and ZEKE STOKES

#

Continue Reading

Politics

Harris makes case against Trump in Democratic National Convention speech

Vice president on Thursday noted LGBTQ rights in DNC address

Published

on

Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 22, 2024. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — Closing out the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night, Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a rousing acceptance speech in which she laid out the case against Donald Trump and touched on a number of high-priority policy issues.

Harris began by describing her immigrant parents and their family’s middle class life in the Bay Area, detailing how a formative experience in her girlhood — helping a friend who was being sexually abused — had shaped her decision to become a prosecutor.

From the courtroom to the San Francisco district attorney’s office to the California attorney general’s office to the Senate and vice presidency, Harris detailed her journey to become her party’s presidential nominee — explaining how she was serving the people every step of the way.

“Kamala Harris for the people,” she would tell the judge each day in the courtroom, while Trump, by contrast, has only ever looked out for himself, she said.

In keeping with the theme of many speeches during the convention this week in Chicago, Harris explained how she would chart a new, brighter way forward as commander-in-chief, working to uplift Americans regardless of their differences.

“With this election, our nation has a precious, fleeting opportunity to move past the bitterness, cynicism, and divisive battles of the past,” she said. “A chance to chart a new way forward. Not as members of any one party or faction, but as Americans.”

She repeatedly made the case against Trump, detailing how he is not only “unserious” but also dangerous — a threat to world peace, America’s democratic institutions, the rule of law, women’s rights, and more.

The vice president presented another argument that had been a throughline in remarks by other primetime speakers, the “fundamental freedoms” at stake in this election, and how she would protect them while Trump has vowed to take them away.

She ticked off “the freedom to live safe from gun violence — in our schools, communities, and places of worship” as well as “the freedom to love who you love openly and with pride” and “the freedom to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.”

Harris noted that the “freedom to vote” is “the freedom that unlocks all the others,” retreading some of her earlier remarks about Trump’s efforts to undermine American elections.

The vice president’s second reference to LGBTQ rights came with her proclamation that “America cannot truly be prosperous unless Americans are fully able to make their own decisions about their own lives, especially on matters of heart and home.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Walz rebuffs Trump and Vance’s anti-LGBTQ attacks in convention speech

VP nominee pledges to keep government ‘the hell out of your bedroom’

Published

on

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaks at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 21, 2024. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — Minnesota governor and Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz rebuffed Republican attacks against the LGBTQ community, reproductive freedom, and other foundational, fundamental liberties in an electrifying speech at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night.

“While other states were banning books from their schools, we were banishing hunger from ours,” said the former teacher and football coach, who agreed to serve as faculty advisor to his high school’s gay-straight alliance club in 1999.

“We also protected reproductive freedom, because in Minnesota, we respect our neighbors and the personal choices they make, even if we wouldn’t make those same choices for ourselves,” Walz said. “We’ve got a golden rule: Mind your own damn business. And that includes IVF and fertility treatments.”

The governor discussed his family’s struggles with infertility. He and his wife had children through IVF.

“Some folks just don’t understand what it takes to be a good neighbor,” Walz said, pointing to the Republican presidential and vice presidential nominees. “Take Donald Trump and JD Vance: Their Project 2025 will make things much, much harder for people who are just trying to live their lives.”

“They spent a lot of time pretending they know nothing about this,” he said, “but look, I coached high school football long enough to know, and trust me on this, when somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, they’re going to use it.”

Walz added, “here’s the thing, it’s an agenda nobody asked for. It’s an agenda that serves nobody except the richest and the most extreme amongst us. And it’s an agenda that does nothing for our neighbors in need. Is it weird? Absolutely. But it’s also wrong, and it’s dangerous.”

“We’ve got 76 days,” he said. “That’s nothing. There will be time to sleep when you’re dead. We’re going to leave it on the field. That’s how we’ll keep moving forward. That’s how we’ll turn the page on Donald Trump. That’s how we’ll build a country where workers come first, where health care and housing are human rights, and the government stays the hell out of your bedroom.”

“That’s how we make America a place where no child is left hungry,” Walz said, “where no community is left behind, where nobody gets told they don’t belong. That’s how we’re going to fight. And as the next president of the United States always says, when we fight [crowd: we win!] When we fight, [crowd: We win!] When we fight [crowd: We win!]”

Continue Reading

Politics

Pete Buttigieg contrasts the 2024 tickets in Democratic National Convention speech

Choice is between leaders ‘building bridges’ and those ‘banning books’

Published

on

U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg speaks at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 21, 2024. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — During a powerful speech at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg drew a stark contrast between the Republican and Democratic presidential tickets to illustrate the choice voters will face in November.

The openly gay former mayor of South Bend, Ind., has emerged as among the most high profile surrogates for the Harris-Walz campaign.

Buttigieg said Donald Trump’s decision to choose, as his vice presidential candidate “a guy like JD Vance,” the U.S. senator from Ohio, sends the message “that they are doubling down on negativity and grievance, committing to a concept of campaigning best summed up in one word: darkness.”

“The other side is appealing to what is smallest within you,” he said. “They’re telling you that greatness comes from going back to the past. They’re telling you that anyone different from you is a threat. They’re telling you that your neighbor or nephew or daughter who disagrees with you politically isn’t just wrong, but is now the enemy.”

By contrast, he said, “I believe in a better politics, one that finds us at our most decent and open and brave, the kind of politics that [Vice President] Kamala Harris and [Minnesota Gov.] Tim Walz are offering.”

Buttigieg explained that when he and his husband Chasten are struggling to get their young children seated and ready for dinner, “It’s the part of our day when politics seems the most distant — and yet, the makeup of our kitchen table, the existence of my family is just one example of something that was literally impossible as recently as 25 years ago, when an anxious teenager growing up in Indiana wondered if he would ever find belonging in this world.”

“This kind of life went from impossible to possible, from possible to real, from real to almost ordinary in less than half a lifetime,” he said — adding that it was, at least to some extent, thanks to politics.

“So this November, we get to choose,” Buttigieg said. “We get to choose our president. We get to choose our policies, but most of all, we will choose a better politics, a politics that calls us to our better selves and offers us a better everyday.”

He continued, “That is what Kamala Harris and Tim Walz represents. That is what Democrats represent. That is what awaits us when America decides to end Trump’s politics of darkness once and for all.”

The transportation secretary concluded his remarks by urging Americans to “embrace the leaders who are out there building bridges and reject the ones who are out there banning books.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Becca Balint speaks exclusively with the Blade at the Democratic National Convention

Lesbian Vt. congresswoman spoke at LGBTQ Caucus meeting

Published

on

U.S. Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) speaks at the second LGBTQ Caucus meeting of the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Wednesday, August 21. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — U.S. Rep. Becca Balint (D), Vermont’s first woman and first LGBTQ member of Congress, spoke exclusively with the Washington Blade shortly after her remarks before the second LGBTQ Caucus meeting on Wednesday at the Democratic National Convention.

“There’s so much energy and light,” this week, “and I think people understand that we are starved for connection,” she said. “We’re starved for connection — And it’s not just in our community.”

“It is across the country that people don’t want to live in a hateful, cynical place. They just don’t. And we have a special part in helping people to not just see the joy, but channel the joy. And I think that’s a huge part of our community.”

It was “super fun,” the congresswoman said, when she got a shout-out for her teaching background during the ceremonial roll-call vote on Tuesday, which officially made Vice President Kamala Harris the Democratic presidential nominee.

Asked to share her thoughts on her experience as an LGBTQ educator at a time when schools have become the nexus of Republican-led attacks against the community, particularly targeting queer and transgender young people, Balint said “our students across this country need us, and I mean all of us adults, to show up for them.”

“Educators are under attack” too, she said. “Librarians are under attack. And they believe — by them, I mean the MAGA, the folks who are supporting Project 2025 — they believe that somehow they can stifle who we are by going after teachers and educators and [it’s] not going to work.”

Balint continued, “We are who we are. We’re going to keep being who we are. But we, we need to show up for those teachers. We need to show up for those librarians, because they are the ones day in and day out who are standing up for our kids.”

Harris is “tremendous,” she said. “The day that [Joe] Biden endorsed [her], I endorsed [her]. I believe that she is the exact right leader we need at this moment. She has been very, very good for our community for a very long time.”

“And, you know, she’s the real deal,” Balint said. “She’s the real deal. She she shows up, she does the work, and that’s what we need.”

During the LGBTQ Caucus meeting, writer and LGBTQ activist Charlotte Clymer had noted the absence of trans Democrats in the convention’s primetime lineup featured at the United Center, arguing that congressional candidate and Delaware state Sen. Sarah McBride, who would be the first trans member of Congress, should have been invited to speak.

“We have to continue to work within the Democratic Caucus and the Democratic National Committee to make sure that the face that we’re putting forward to Americans truly represents all of us,” Balint said.

“There are other groups, too, that I know feel like they wish that they were more represented as well,” she said. “And this is a work in progress.”

Balint added that “it’s one of the reasons why I am extremely excited that Sarah McBride is going to be my colleague. She’s going to win in Delaware. She’s going to do it. She’s a star, and I can’t wait to welcome her.”

Continue Reading

Politics

HRC president speaks at Democratic National Convention

Kelley Robinson shared family’s journey from slavery to freedom

Published

on

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson speaks at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 21, 2024. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson addressed the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, beginning with a stirring account of her family’s journey from enslavement in antebellum Mississippi to freedom in Muscatine, Iowa.

“Progress is happening,” HRC’s first Black woman leader said, noting that the country is “preparing to elect President Kamala Harris.”

“My friends, the 20+ million LGBTQ+ Americans are living proof,” Robinson said. “We are your friends and your neighbors, your classmates and your family — like Daniel, a trans kid in Tucson who’s going to his very first prom, like Eric from San Antonio, who sacrificed in combat and then came home to battle ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ like Sandy and Kris, the first same-sex couple to get legally married in California 11 years ago, in a ceremony officiated by Kamala Harris.”

By contrast, “Donald Trump wants to erase us,” she said. “He would ban our healthcare, belittle our marriages, bury our stories. But we are not going anywhere. We are not going back.”

“Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, they are champions for LGBTQ+ freedom, y’all,” Robinson said. “So tonight, we’re fighting for lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer and trans freedom without exception. We’re fighting for equality for all without exception. We’re fighting for joy. Somebody say joy? Somebody say joy. Somebody say joy, without exception.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Jared Polis warns of the dangers of Project 2025

Gay Colo. governor spoke at Democratic National Convention on Wednesday

Published

on

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis speaks at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 21, 2024. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

CHICAGO — Addressing the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, gay Colorado Gov. Jared Polis warned of the dangers presented by Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s governing blueprint for a second Donald Trump administration.

He began by outlining the extreme restrictions on reproductive freedom that would be effectuated under the plan, which would go far beyond an abortion ban.

“It says that Donald Trump could use an obscure law from the 1800s to single handedly ban abortion in all 50 states, even putting doctors in jail,” he said, while “page 486 puts limits on contraception” and “page 450 threatens access to IVF.”

“On page 455,” Polis continued, “Project 2025 says that states have to report miscarriages to the Trump administration” and “page 451 says the only legitimate family is a married mother and father, where only the father works.”

The governor spoke while holding a large “Project 2025” book. Tearing out a page, he said, “You know what? I’m going to take that one out. I’m going to put that in my pocket so I can share it with undecided voters, so they better understand what’s at stake this election.”

Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic Party’s presidential and vice presidential nominees, have focused much of their messaging on issues of reproductive freedom. The Walz family had their children through IVF.

“Project 2025 would turn the entire federal government and bureaucracy into a massive machine,” Polis said. “It would weaponize it to control our reproductive and personal choices.”

“Look, as a Redditor, gamer, entrepreneur and Swifty from the Free State of Colorado, I’m excited by Kamala Harris’s vision for protecting and expanding our personal freedom, internet freedom and economic freedom,” he said.

“Democrats welcome weird, but we’re not weirdos telling families who can and can’t have kids, who to marry, or how to live our lives,” the governor said, setting up a contrast with the Republican ticket.

“These Project 2025 people” like Trump and U.S. Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice presidential nominee, “are not just weird — they’re dangerous,” Polis said.

“They want to take us backwards, but we aren’t going back — like ever, ever, ever,” he said, a reference to Taylor Swift’s single, “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together.”

“Let’s stop project 2025 and elect Kamala Harris president this November.”

Continue Reading

Popular