News Analysis
Anti-LGBTQ+ hate is flourishing on Spanish-language radio & online
Toxic rhetoric claiming the LGBTQ community aims to “indoctrinate,” “mutilate,” & “abuse” children spreading in Spanish-language media
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2022/07/conservative_talk_radio_lgbtq.png)
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2021/08/MMFA-Logo.jpg)
By Leo Fernandez, G. Capuano & Janos Balazs with additional research by Monica Rodriguez | WASHINGTON – Much like their English–language counterparts, right-wing voices in Spanish-language media are fixated on attacking the LGBTQ community, seizing any opportunity to spread hateful rhetoric against them.
Right-wing commentators on Spanish-language radio and in online spaces have demonized Pride events and gay representation and claimed that being transgender is a “mental illness” pushed by “perverted” Democrats. Also, like recent anti-LGBTQ attacks from English right-wing media, many Spanish-language attacks on the LGBTQ community have revolved around children, with some commentators suggesting that parents who support their LGBTQ children should be charged with “child abuse.”
GLAAD’s 2022 Social Media Safety Index found that major social media platforms in the U.S. — Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok — have failed to provide a welcoming or safe experience for LGBTQ users, including by not curbing rampant Spanish-language misinformation and right-wing extremism thriving on the platforms. This inaction has created an ideal environment for conservative anti-LGBTQ attacks to proliferate across the internet.
Additionally, the Spanish-language right-wing radio figures Media Matters tracks are also broadcasting anti-LGBTQ talking points to their audiences. The rhetoric often mirrors English-language attacks about “groomers” and the idea that the LGBTQ community is pushing “gender ideology” on children.
Here are examples of how right-wing narratives demonizing the LGBTQ community get highlighted in right-wing Spanish-language radio and online spaces.
Claiming LGBTQ people are indoctrinating children
Conservatives on Spanish-language radio and in Spanish online spaces are pushing tired and false narratives claiming that LGBTQ people aim to indoctrinate, groom, and sexualize children. The increasing popularity of this smear with conservatives also coincides with calls and actions from the right to separate trans and LGBTQ children from parents who support them.
- Sublevados, a conservative media outlet with over 27,000 Twitter followers, framed Pride as a danger to children and called LGBTQ people “sickos.” “It is clearer and clearer: Kids are the ultimate target for progressives. This is why we cannot yield even a millimeter and we have to be relentless against those sickos.” [Twitter, 07/10/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Cada vez más claro: el objetivo último del progresismo son los niños. Por eso es que no podemos ceder ni un milímetro y tenemos que ser implacables con estos enfermos.”
- Salvadoran gospel artist Pablo Rosales, who regularly shares homophobic content with his 900,000 followers across Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, posted a video claiming there are “11 steps they use to drag kids from their homes and over to Pride.” [Facebook, 6/13/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “GUIA PASO A PASO de Cómo RECLUTAN a los niños para es MARCHA – ‘En el video que estamos apunto de ver, hay al menos 11 pasos, para arrastrar a los niños desde su casa hacia el orgullo.’”
- Marcel Garcia, a conservative Spanish YouTuber with more than 100,000 subscribers, claimed that “ped0philia and LGBT have a lot in common.” Users across multiple platforms often use coded language and intentional misspellings to avoid moderation, and Garcia did the same by altering the word “pedophilia.” He said, “Is there or has there been a relationship between pedophile activism and LGBT activism? Definitely. At its founding, pedophiles were part of the gay movement and even marched alongside each other to reclaim their rights during the sexual revolution.” [Facebook, 6/28/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Ped0filia y LGTB: Mucho en común – ‘¿Existe o ha existido relación entre el activismo ped0fil0 y el activismo LGTB? Sin duda. En sus orígenes los ped0fil0s formaban parte del colectivo gay e incluso marcharon juntos reclamando sus libertades durante la revolución s3xual.’”
- On his show Entre Líneas, host Freddy Silva claimed that the LGBTQ community is “indoctrinating little kids.” “There are more and more corrupt legislators at the national level who are looking for ways to bring these policies to our youngest children,” Silva said. Silva’s show is part of the increasingly toxic conservative Spanish-language SiriusXM channel Americano Radio. [Americano Radio, Entre Lineas, 6/6/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “No estamos en contra de las personas que forman de la comunidad LGBTQ+. Conozco a muchas personas … [que] tampoco están de acuerdo con la ideología que se está llevando a cabo en donde están adoctrinando a los más pequeños, y que cada vez existen más legisladores corruptos a nivel nacional, que están buscando la forma de cómo llevar estas políticas a los mas pequenos.”
- On her show Perspectiva USA, host Dania Alexandrino claimed Democrats are pushing a “Machivellian” agenda to turn children LGBTQ: “The purpose is what I mentioned just moments ago: social reengineering. A Machiavellian mentality to normalize children, from a very early age, identifying with the opposite sex or being attracted to boys or girls of their own gender. … At this rate, 20 years from now, everyone will be gay. … All the kids will be gay. … If you don’t think this is a ploy by the Democrats and the globalist left, … you are part of the problem. ” [Americano Media, Perspectiva USA, 6/3/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “El propósito es lo que yo he mencionado en otros momentos – una reingeniería social. Una mentalidad maquiavelica de normalizar que niños desde bien temprana edad, digan que se identifican con el sexo opuesto, o que les gustan los ninos o las ninas de su mismo genero … al ritmo que vamos, de aqui a 20 años, todos vamos a ser gay. Todos los niños ahora van a ser gay. … Si usted no cree que esto es una de las tácticas del partido demócrata y de la izquierda — globalista, … usted es parte del problema.”
- On her show Cada Tarde, conservative South Florida radio host Carines Moncada lied that children are being “indoctrinated” to undergo gender-confirmation surgeries and suggested that is a cause for high rates of suicide attempts in the LGBTQ community. Moncada said, “Now, it turns out that because I asked if a woman is the only one who can give birth, who can breastfeed and have children, that’s the reason transgenders commit suicide in this country. Why are we not thinking about the number of children who are being raised — they are mentally manipulated — who are being indoctrinated to remove their intimate parts, to mutilate their breasts and stunt their development. … And then, when they feel they made a mistake, that they are lost, that this is not what they really wanted, but rather that they were manipulated by this diabolical agenda, then it’s my fault that one of these people commits suicide?” [Actualidad Radio, Cada Tarde, 7/12/22, translated from Spanish].
- Original Spanish: “Ahora resulta, que por que yo cuestiono, de que si una mujer es la única que puede dar a luz, y que puede amamantar, y puede tener hijos, entonces esta es la causa del sucidio en este país de los transgéneros? Por que no se ponen a pensar la cantidad de niños que los están llevando, los están manipulando mentalmente, los están adoctrinando, a que si quiten sus partes intimas, a que mutilen sus senos, o el crecimiento de los senos. … Y después cuando se sienten que cometieron un error, que están perdidos, que eso no es realmente lo que querían, sino que se dieron cuenta que fueron realmente manipulados por esta agenda diabólica, entonces la culpa es mía de que una persona esta se suicide?”
Claiming drag shows are dangerous for children
Drag shows and other Pride Month events have been increasingly targeted by conservative media figures and politicians, who have been calling for harassment and violence against the LGBTQ community by couching it as a safety concern for children. This has led to escalated security concerns for LGBTQ activists and community members. Conservative Spanish-language commentators and outlets have echoed the extremist calls for children to be taken away from families who support LGBTQ rights.
- Anthony Cabassa, a correspondent for conservative bilingual outlet El American, published an article promoting conservative anti-LGBTQ legislation, parroting claims that drag shows are “sexualizing young children.” In the article, he repeatedly quoted state Rep. Bryan Slaton (R-TX), who claimed that these events are “horrifying and show a disturbing trend in which perverted adults are obsessed with sexualizing young children.” [El American, 6/6/22]
- Tierra Pura, a far-right news site, published an article on Telegram claiming that Pizza Hut is indoctrinating children with a book about drag. It claimed, “Pizza Hut joins the indoctrination agenda by introducing a book on ‘Drag Kids’ aimed at kindergarteners.” [Telegram, 6/5/22]
![Pizza Hut joins the indoctrination agenda by introducing a book on ‘Drag Kids’ aimed at kindergarteners.](https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/embedded-images/tp.png?VersionId=u_wWpJkYXbI.P2O3HJ6Xtt8P4BiEGdtI)
- On Entre Líneas, host Freddy Silva claimed that “dragging kids to Pride constitutes child abuse” that requires police action. Silva said: “Here we have a grave concern because it has even been reported that this could be child abuse and that the police should act in a way to protect these children.” [Americano Media, Entre Líneas, 6/6/22]
- Original Spanish: “Aqui existe una grave preoccupacion, por que incluso se a logrado o se a llegado a denunciar que esto podría tratarse de abuso infantil, y que la policia deberia de actuar de alguna manera para protejer a estos niños.”
Boycotting entertainment
Conservatives frequently gin up anti-LGBTQ attacks on positive representations of the LGBTQ community. For example, leading up to the release of the Disney film Lightyear, The Daily Wire and Ben Shapiro criticized it for pushing a “not-at-all-secret gay agenda.” On social media, conservative Spanish-language commentators have echoed these attacks, including celebrating low box-office revenue for supposedly “woke” films, attributing their lack of success to the inclusion of LGBTQ representation.
- El Bunker Antifemnista, an anti-feminism Facebook group with over 141,000 followers, shared a post suggesting that the Minions film performed highly at the box office because it did not intend “to indoctrinate with gender ideology.” The page claimed, “Without forced inclusion (without aiming to indoctrinate with gender ideology), Minions The Rise Of Gru has exceeded 200 million dollars in worldwide box office sales, YOU READ THAT RIGHT, MORE THAN 200 MILLION. In less than 3 days, The Minions overtook Lightyear at the global box office sales, which has been going on for more than 3 weeks. The people, THE PUBLIC, THOSE WHO PAY, we know what we want.” [Facebook, 7/4/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Minions The Rise Of Gru, sin inclusión forzada (sin pretender adoctrinar con ideología de género), ha superado los 200 millones de dólares en la taquilla mundial, LO QUE LEE, SUPERÓ LOS 200 MILLONES. En menos de 3 días, Los Minions superaron en taquilla mundial a Lightyear que lleva más de 3 semanas. La gente, EL PÚBLICO, LOS QUE PAGAMOS, sabemos lo que queremos.”
- The New Dawn, a YouTube channel, posted a video titled, “I want to unsubscribe from [my Disney] service because this [Pride] flag appears in what my 4-year-old children watch.” The channel promotes numerous conspiracy theories to more than 146,000 subscribers. [YouTube, 7/11/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Quiero dar de baja el servicio por que aparece esa bandera que ven mis hijos de 4 años.”
- Far-right Telegram channel Hijo de las Estrellas shared an article from The Gateway Pundit, translating the article’s headline which claims Thor: Love and Thunder is part of a series of “woke” Disney films failing at the box office. The channel, which peddles conspiracy theories to its over 11,000 subscribers, wrote: “AVOID AT ALL COSTS: ‘Thor Love and Thunder’ – Unless you like Woke movies where even rock people are gay and have babies and the queen is a ‘king.’” [Telegram, 7/11/22, translated from Spanish]
![AVOID AT ALL COSTS: ‘Thor Love and Thunder’ - Unless you like Woke movies where even rock people are gay and have babies and the queen is a ‘king](https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/embedded-images/1_1.png?VersionId=Xd9wEAh0qLmN.Cxx86AKc1uiPY8owVoV)
- Abogados antifeministas, a right-wing Facebook group with over 75,000 followers, posted a screenshot of a tweet celebrating the loss of rights for women and trans athletes and low box office profits for Lightyear: “The best Pride month, right? Roe v. Wade revoked, Lightyear a total failure, trans athletes banned from competing in women’s sports.” [Facebook, 6/26/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: El mejor Pride Month no? Revocación del Roe vs Wade. Lightyear un fracaso total. Deportistas trans vetados de competencias femeninas.
Demonizing trans athletes
Attacks on transgender athletes are extremely prevelant in English-language right-wing outlets and consequently have become amplified by Spanish-speaking media figures. Transphobic claims gained particular traction in Spanish after FINA, the international swimming federation, and British Cycling, the U.K.’s cycling regulating body, restricted trans athletes from competing at elite women’s competitions earlier this year.
- Popular Spanish-language right-wing publication La Derecha Diario responded to the ban on trans swimmers by saying, “Sanity prevail[ed] over gender madness.” The account, which has over 165,000 followers on Twitter, also misgendered trans women, calling them “transgender men,” tweeting, “Sanity prevail[s] over gender madness: International swimming organization FINA bans transgender men from competing in women’s leagues.” [Twitter, 6/20/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “La cordura prevaleció sobre la locura de género: La organización internacional de natación FINA prohíbe a los hombres transgénero competir en ligas femeninas.”
- Popular conservative Spanish YouTuber Marcel Garcia said trans athletes are not “real women.” Garcia, who has over 17,000 Facebook subscribers, claimed, “The United Kingdom bans trans cyclists from competing against real women.” [Facebook, 6/6/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Reino Unido prohíbe a las ciclistas trans competir contra mujeres reales.”
- Telegram channel Despertador de La Matrix shared attacks against trans Australian surfer Sasha Jane Lowerson. The account, which has over 80,000 subscribers, said: “Why can’t I feel like I’m a 7-year-old and compete against them, for example in basketball??” [Telegram, 5/23/22, translated from Spanish]
![If anyone who identifies as a woman can compete against other women … why can't I identify as a 7-year-old and compete against them, for example in basketball?](https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/embedded-images/2_3.png?VersionId=6J9JWN5_rkkZ9d0EuZ0cAxem0tBEdmT1)
- Right-wing conspiracy theory account Doctor Manhattan reborn claimed “justice” had been served in women’s sports. The account, which has more than 41,000 Twitter subscribers, wrote, “After swimming comes rugby. Little by little, justice is being served in women’s sports. Track and field should be next.” [Twitter, 6/23/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “Tras la natación llega el rugby. Poco a poco se hace justicia en el deporte femenino. Lo siguiente debería ser el atletismo.”
Denying the existence of trans people
Much like their English–language counterparts, Spanish-speaking conservative figures and right-wing media outlets have focused on spreading baseless and inflammatory content that demonizes nonbinary and trans people or claims they don’t exist.
- Rebelión NOM, a Spanish-language right-wing Telegram channel with over 6,000 subscribers, claimed, “There is not a great variety of genders. There are two genders and then a great variety of mental disorders.” The account wrote: “That’s the damn truth.” [Telegram, 6/25/22, translated from Spanish]
![There is not a great variety of genders. There are two genders and then a great variety of mental disorders.](https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/embedded-images/nom.png?VersionId=BUW5hdKcVUMRdC6s2cvT2nsKfNNH_5.b)
- Mexican actor and conservative influencer Eduardo Verástegui claimed, “Gender ideology is absurd, [and] invented by those who promote abortion and same-sex unions.” Verástegui, who has over 229,000 followers on Twitter, wrote: “Abortion is a crime. And marriage is between a man and a woman. Gender ideology is absurd, invented by those who also promote abortion and same-sex unions.” [Twitter, 6/26/22, translated from Spanish]
- Original Spanish: “El aborto es un crimen. Y el matrimonio es entre hombre y mujer. La ideología de género es absurda, inventada por gente que promueve tanto el aborto como las uniones entre personas del mismo sexo. Al grano y sin rodeos. ¡Viva México! Dios bendiga a México y al mundo entero.”
********************
The preceding article was previously published by Media Matters for America and is republished by permission.
News Analysis
Time to double down in the fight for democracy
Our lives and liberties hang in the balance:
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2023/02/US_and_rainbow_flags_insert_courtesy_Reportar_sin_Miedo.jpg)
This Fourth of July, the LGBTQ community faces an unprecedented crisis as recent legal and political developments threaten to unravel all of our hard-won rights and protections. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling granting former presidents broad immunity from civil lawsuits for official acts has sent shockwaves through the community. This decision could empower future presidents, including a potential second Trump term, to take extreme actions against marginalized groups without fear of personal legal consequences.
“This ruling has catastrophic implications for LGBTQ rights,” warns Sarah Warbeck, director of the HRC’s LGBTQ Rights Project. “A president with such immunity could devastate our community’s protections, from workplace rights to healthcare access for transgender individuals.”
The immunity ruling, coupled with the Supreme Court’s conservative majority and the looming threat of an anti-LGBTQ administration, creates what activists describe as a “perfect storm” of vulnerability.
Critics highlight the mainstream media’s failure to adequately address Trump’s legal issues and his ties to conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation. The Foundation’s “Project 2025” is viewed by many as a blueprint for policies that could eviscerate LGBTQ rights.
While debates about President Biden’s capabilities persist, LGBTQ advocates emphasize the more pressing concern of Trump’s documented machine gun of lies, his misuse of power and ongoing felonious legal troubles.
“We must mobilize immediately to elect officials at all levels who will defend LGBTQ rights,” urges Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.). “There’s no room for complacency. Our community is under attack.”
LGBTQ leaders stress that this fight now encompasses fundamental issues of democratic governance and the balance of powers. They call for unprecedented solidarity, grassroots organizing, and civic engagement.
The Los Angeles Blade issues an urgent call to action: “Every LGBTQ individual, ally, and supporter must double down and engage in renewed activism and constant vigilance. Our lives and liberties hang in the balance,” says publisher Troy Masters. He adds, “Without a strong LGBTQ press, our community will indeed perish. We need your support.”
This Independence Day marks a critical juncture for the LGBTQ community. The time for action is now.
Get out of the weeds of the debate and save yourself.
Research/Study
LGBTQ people in LA County struggle with cost of living & safety
Approximately 665,000 LGBTQ adults live in Los Angeles County, according to new research from the Williams Institute
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/02/California-Department-of-Aging.jpg)
LOS ANGELES – Approximately 665,000 LGBTQ adults live in Los Angeles County, according to new research from the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law that looks at the lived experiences and needs of LGBTQ people.
The majority (82%) believe that LA County is a good place for LGBTQ people to live and that elected officials are responsive to their needs. However, affording to live in LA County is their most common worry.
Over one-third (35%) of LGBTQ Angelenos live below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), including almost half (47%) of transgender and nonbinary people, and they experience high rates of food insecurity and housing instability.
Nearly one in three (32%) LGBTQ households in Los Angeles County and more than one in five (23%) non-LGBTQ households experienced food insecurity in the prior year. In addition, more than 60% of LGBTQ people live in households that are cost-burdened by housing expenses, spending 30% or more of their household income on housing. A quarter (26%) of LGBTQ people live in households where over 50% of the household’s monthly income is spent on rent or mortgage payments.
“LA County represents a promise of equality and freedom to LGBTQ people who live here and throughout the country,” said lead author Brad Sears, the Founding Executive Director at the Williams Institute. “But that promise is being undermined by the County’s rapidly escalating cost of living.”
This report used representative data collected from 1,006 LGBTQ adults in Los Angeles County who completed the 2023 Los Angeles County Health Survey (LACHS) conducted by the Los Angeles County Public Health Department. The data also included responses from 504 LGBTQ individuals who participated in the Lived Experiences in Los Angeles County (LELAC) Survey, a LACHS call-back survey developed by the Williams Institute.
More than half (51%) of LGBTQ adults said they have been verbally harassed, with 39% experiencing this in the past five years. As a result, one in five LGBTQ people have avoided public places such as businesses, parks, and public transportation in the last year. About 40% of LGBTQ people do not believe that law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles County treat LGBTQ people fairly.
A companion study published today surveyed 322 trans and nonbinary individuals in Los Angeles County. Results showed that the cost of living in LA County was the most significant concern for trans and nonbinary respondents, with 59% indicating that it is a serious problem. More than one-quarter (28%) of the participants were unemployed, compared to 5% of LA County overall.
The survey also revealed significant disparities in health and health care access, especially for trans and nonbinary adults who were women or transfeminine, immigrants, and those living at or near the FPL.
“Understanding the life experiences of trans and nonbinary people is important so that we can begin to improve the quality of our lives in LA County,” said study co-author Bamby Salcedo, President and CEO of the TransLatin@ Coalition. “Trans and nonbinary people are best suited to envision ways to support and uplift the community, along with trans-led organizations that have already been doing this work. LA County must commit to greater support of the organizations serving our community.”
Survey respondents were twice as likely as the general population of LA County to report having fair or poor health (27%), being uninsured (14%), and going without health care (46%).
“Despite a supportive policy environment in Los Angeles County, experiences of stigma and discrimination still exist and can hinder access to necessary resources for trans and nonbinary residents,” said lead author Jody Herman, Senior Scholar of Public Policy at the Williams Institute. “It is crucial for local officials and service providers to enact policies, provide education and training, and establish accountability to ensure respectful and positive interaction with the trans and nonbinary community.”
A third report focuses on LGBTQ people’s assessment of LA County programs and services and recommendations for local elected officials.
“These findings from the Williams Institute provide invaluable data that will guide our Board, County departments, and the inaugural LGBTQ+ Commission in shaping policies and programs to truly deliver for our diverse LGBTQ+ communities,” said LA County Board Chair Lindsey P. Horvath, who initiated the motion to present the findings to the Board.
“It’s especially critical that we support our trans, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary communities, ensuring they feel safe and supported, and that they are able to afford to live in Los Angeles County. These insights will guide our essential and transformative work.”
“Many LGBTQ people provided recommendations for elected officials to improve quality of life in Los Angeles County,” said principal investigator Kerith J. Conron, Research Director at the Williams Institute. “LGBTQ people are asking for visible allyship, increased representation of LGBTQ individuals in elected positions and civil service, and housing and financial support.”
“These recent findings serve as a sobering reminder of the persistent barriers faced by the LGBT community in Los Angeles County,” said Dr. Barbara Ferrer, PhD, MPH, MEd, Director of Public Health. “These reports underscore the profound impact of the disparities on the health and wellbeing of a community that include our family members, colleagues, and friends. It is imperative that we not only acknowledge these inequities but actively engage in eliminating them. Through collaborative efforts with community leaders, policymakers, and the public, Public Health is committed to upholding principles of justice and equity by ensuring that every member of our community has the resources they need to thrive.”
Research/Study
New Polling: 65% of Black Americans support Black LGBTQ rights
73% of Gen Z respondents (between the ages of 12 and 27) “agree that the Black community should do more to support Black LGBTQ+ people”
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/06/National-Black-Justice-Coalition-June-2024.jpg)
WASHINGTON – The National Black Justice Coalition, a D.C.-based LGBTQ advocacy organization, announced on June 19 that it commissioned what it believes to be a first-of-its-kind national survey of Black people in the United States in which 65 percent said they consider themselves “supporters of Black LGBTQ+ people and rights,” with 57 percent of the supporters saying they were “churchgoers.”
In a press release describing the findings of the survey, NBJC said it commissioned the research firm HIT Strategies to conduct the survey with support from five other national LGBTQ organizations – the Human Rights Campaign, the National LGBTQ Task Force, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, Family Equality, and GLSEN.
“One of the first surveys of its kind, explicitly sampling Black people (1,300 participants) on Black LGBTQ+ people and issues – including an oversampling of Black LGBTQ+ participants to provide a more representative view of this subgroup – it investigates the sentiments, stories, perceptions, and priorities around Black values and progressive policies, to better understand how they impact Black views on Black LGBTQ+ people,” the press release says.
It says the survey found, among other things, that 73 percent of Gen Z respondents, who in 2024 are between the ages of 12 and 27, “agree that the Black community should do more to support Black LGBTQ+ people.”
According to the press release, it also found that 40 percent of Black people in the survey reported having a family member who identifies as LGBTQ+ and 80 percent reported having “some proximity to gay, lesbian, bisexual, or queer people, but only 42 percent have some proximity to transgender or gender-expansive people.”
The survey includes these additional findings:
• 86% of Black people nationally report having a feeling of shared fate and connectivity with other Black people in the U.S., but this view doesn’t fully extend to the Black LGBTQ+ community. Around half — 51% — of Black people surveyed feel a shared fate with Black LGBTQ+ people.
• 34% reported the belief that Black LGBTQ+ people “lead with their sexual orientation or gender identity.” Those participants were “significantly less likely to support the Black LGBTQ+ community and most likely to report not feeling a shared fate with Black LGBTQ+ people.”
• 92% of Black people in the survey reported “concern about youth suicide after being shown statistics about the heightened rate among Black LGBTQ+ youth.” Those expressing this concern included 83% of self-reported opponents of LGBTQ+ rights.
• “Black people’s support for LGBTQ+ rights can be sorted into three major groups: 29% Active Accomplices, 25% Passive Allies (high potential to be moved), 35% Opponents. Among Opponents, ‘competing priorities’ and ‘religious beliefs’ are the two most significant barriers to supporting Black LGBTQ+ people and issues.”
• 10% of the survey participants identified as LGBTQ. Among those who identified as LGBTQ, 38% identified as bisexual, 33% identified as lesbian or gay, 28% identified as non-binary or gender non-conforming, and 6% identified as transgender.
• Also, among those who identified as LGBTQ, 89% think the Black community should do more to support Black LGBTQ+ people, 69% think Black LGBTQ+ people have fewer rights and freedoms than other Black people, 35% think non-Black LGBTQ+ people have fewer rights and freedom than other Black people, 54% “feel their vote has a lot of power,” 51% live in urban areas, and 75% rarely or never attend church.
Additional information about the survey from NBJC can be accessed here.
Research/Study
63% of LGBTQ+ people have faced employment discrimination
The report’s findings also show 70% of LGBTQ+ people feel lonely, misunderstood, marginalized, or excluded at work
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/06/LGBTQ-Federal-Employess-Dept-of-Labor.jpg)
WASHINGTON -A newly released report on the findings of a survey of 2,000 people in the U.S. who identify as LGBTQ says 63 percent of respondents have faced workplace discrimination in their career, 45 percent reported being “passed over” for a promotion due to their LGBTQ status, and 30 percent avoid “coming out” at work due to fear of discrimination.
The report, called “Unequal Opportunities: LGBTQ+ Discrimination In The Workplace,” was conducted by EduBirdie, a company that provides s professional essay writing service for students.
“The research shows basic acceptance remains elusive,” a statement released by the company says. “Thirty percent of LGBTQ+ people are concerned they will face discrimination if they come out at work, while 1 in 4 fear for their safety,” the statement says. “Alarmingly, 2 in 5 have had their orientation or identity disclosed without consent.”
Avery Morgan, an EduBirdie official, says in the statement, “Despite progress in LGBTQ+ human rights, society stigma persists. Our findings show 70% of LGBTQ+ people feel lonely, misunderstood, marginalized, or excluded at work, and 59% believe their sexual orientation or gender identity has hindered their careers.”
According to Morgan, “One of the biggest challenges businesses should be aware of is avoiding tokenism and appearing inauthentic in their actions. Employers must be genuine with their decisions to bring a more diverse workforce into the organization.”
The report includes these additional findings:
• 44% of LGBTQ people responding to the survey said they have quit a job due to lack of acceptance.
• 15% reported facing discrimination “going unaddressed” by their employer.
• 21% “choose not to report incidents that occur at work.”
• 44% of LGBTQ+ workers feel their company is bad at raising awareness about their struggles.
• Half of LGBTQ+ people change their appearance, voice, or mannerisms to fit in at work.
• 56% of LGBTQ+ people would be more comfortable coming out at work if they had a more senior role.
At least 32 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws banning employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, according to the Human Rights Campaign. The EduBirdie report does not show which states participants of the survey are from. EduBirdie spokesperson Anna Maglysh told the Washington Blade the survey was conducted anonymously to protect the privacy of participants.
The full report can be accessed here.
Research/Study
2024 GLAAD Social Media Safety Index: Social media platforms fail
Despite moderate score improvements since 2023 on LGBTQ safety, privacy, and expression, all platforms insufficiently protect LGBTQ users
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/05/f-school-letter-grade-scaled.jpg)
NEW YORK – GLAAD released its fourth annual Social Media Safety Index (SMSI) on Tuesday giving virtually every major social media company a failing grade as it surveyed LGBTQ safety, privacy, and expression online.
According to GLAAD, the world’s largest LGBTQ+ media advocacy organization, YouTube, X/Twitter, and Meta’s Facebook, Instagram, and Threads – received failing F grades on the SMSI Platform Scorecard for the third consecutive year.
The only exception was Chinese company ByteDance owned TikTok, which earned a D+.
Some platforms have shown improvements in their scores since last year. Others have fallen, and overall, the scores remain abysmal, with all platforms other than TikTok receiving F grades.
● TikTok: D+ — 67% (+10 points from 2023)
● Facebook: F — 58% (-3 points from 2023)
● Instagram: F — 58% (-5 points from 2023)
● YouTube: F — 58% (+4 points from 2023)
● Threads: F — 51% (new 2024 rating)
● Twitter: F — 41% (+8 points from 2023)
This year’s report also illuminates the epidemic of anti-LGBTQ hate, harassment, and disinformation across major social media platforms, and especially makes note of high-follower hate accounts and right-wing figures who continue to manufacture and circulate most of this activity.
“In addition to these egregious levels of inadequately moderated anti-LGBTQ hate and disinformation, we also see a corollary problem of over-moderation of legitimate LGBTQ expression — including wrongful takedowns of LGBTQ accounts and creators, shadowbanning, and similar suppression of LGBTQ content. Meta’s recent policy change limiting algorithmic eligibility of so-called ‘political content,’ which the company partly defines as: ‘social topics that affect a group of people and/or society large’ is especially concerning,” GLAAD’s Senior Director of Social Media Safety Jenni Olson said in the press release annoucing the report’s findings.
Specific LGBTQ safety, privacy, and expression issues identified include:
● Inadequate content moderation and problems with policy development and enforcement (including issues with both failure to mitigate anti-LGBTQ content and over-moderation/suppression of LGBTQ users);
● Harmful algorithms and lack of algorithmic transparency; inadequate transparency and user controls around data privacy;
● An overall lack of transparency and accountability across the industry, among many other issues — all of which disproportionately impact LGBTQ users and other marginalized communities who are uniquely vulnerable to hate, harassment, and discrimination.
Key Conclusions:
● Anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and disinformation on social media translates to real-world offline harms.
● Platforms are largely failing to successfully mitigate dangerous anti-LGBTQ hate and disinformation and frequently do not adequately enforce their own policies regarding such content.
● Platforms also disproportionately suppress LGBTQ content, including via removal, demonetization, and forms of shadowbanning.
● There is a lack of effective, meaningful transparency reporting from social media companies with regard to content moderation, algorithms, data protection, and data privacy practices.
Core Recommendations:
● Strengthen and enforce existing policies that protect LGBTQ people and others from hate, harassment, and misinformation/disinformation, and also from suppression of legitimate LGBTQ expression.
● Improve moderation including training moderators on the needs of LGBTQ users, and moderate across all languages, cultural contexts, and regions. This also means not being overly reliant on AI.
● Be transparent with regard to content moderation, community guidelines, terms of service policy implementation, algorithm designs, and enforcement reports. Such transparency should be facilitated via working with independent researchers.
● Stop violating privacy/respect data privacy. To protect LGBTQ users from surveillance and discrimination, platforms should reduce the amount of data they collect, infer, and retain. They should cease the practice of targeted surveillance advertising, including the use of algorithmic content recommendation. In addition, they should implement end-to-end encryption by default on all private messaging to protect LGBTQ people from persecution, stalking, and violence.
● Promote civil discourse and proactively message expectations for user behavior, including respecting platform hate and harassment policies.
Read the report here: (Link)
Research/Study
The Daily Wire: New vitamins will boost sperm & fight “wokeness”
Marketing for The Daily Wire’s venture tries to cash in on fear of trans people & drag queens promoting an alternative to “woke” companies
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/05/daily-wires-new-vitamins.png)
By Mia Gingerich | WASHINGTON – The Daily Wire announced the launch of a new “men’s lifestyle” company named Responsible Man on May 1, promoting its only current product — a men’s dietary supplement that it says is “designed to help … sharpen brain cognition” and that it suggests will help address what the outlet calls the “increasing health risk” of declining “sperm concentration.”
On April 30, The Daily Wire’s parent company Bentkey Ventures registered the assumed name “Daily Wire Ventures.” The next day, on May 1, it debuted Responsible Man, a new company for men’s health products.
The Daily Wire is promoting Responsible Man as an alternative to “woke” companies and by fearmongering about some of the outlet’s frequent targets, namely gender-affirming care and drag queens, asking its readers, “Do you want to buy your men’s health products from a company that partners with drag queens and supports radical organizations that push gender procedures on children?” Responsible Man’s website uses similar language, promising its customers that “together, we can reclaim masculinity” and claiming that “Emerson’s Vitamins are a simple step towards improving yourself, creating order, and building the future.”
Ad from Responsible Man’s website:
The Daily Wire’s promotion suggests Responsible Man’s products can help address various health issues, including the purported “increasing health risk” of declining “sperm concentration” worldwide, promising to help men stay healthy “for the survival of the human race.”
The company’s only product, a men’s multivitamin, is marketed as being “professionally engineered by medical doctors” to “support your immune system, maintain energy production, sharpen brain cognition, and support the health of your heart and muscles.”
Claims made by The Daily Wire’s new company are not FDA-approved
According to disclaimers on Responsible Man’s website, the claims made to promote the company’s vitamins “have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.” Multivitamins do not need to go through an evaluation process prior to entering the marketplace, and have generally proved ineffective in reducing the risk of heart disease and mental decline.
In the past, The Daily Wire has targeted certain medications used in gender-affirming care for trans youth for their use off-label without FDA approval, even though this is a common practice in prescribing pediatric medications. The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh has been particularly fervent in wielding this point to target gender-affirming care.
The Daily Wire is promoting the new company by targeting Men’s Health magazine
The Daily Wire’s previous ventures into consumer goods have been framed in opposition to specific companies it deemed too “woke,” such as Harry’s Razors and Hershey’s Chocolate, for refusing to advertise with The Daily Wire and featuring a trans woman in an advertisement, respectively. (Jeremy’s Razors and Jeremy’s Chocolate, The Daily Wire’s answers to Harry’s and Hershey’s going “woke,” have received poor feedback from customers.)
The Daily Wire’s promotion of Responsible Man singles out for criticism Men’s Health, the largest men’s lifestyle magazine in the United States. Claiming that Men’s Health was “afraid of manhood itself,” The Daily Wire has declared itself “here to give you a better option.” The lone source of outrage cited by the outlet is a Men’s Health article from November 2021 on “LGBTQ+ Language and Media Literacy.”
******************************************************************************************
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2021/10/Mia-Gingerich.jpg)
Mia Gingerich is a researcher at Media Matters. She has a bachelor’s degree in politics and government from Northern Arizona University and has previously worked in rural organizing and local media.
The preceding article was previously published by Media Matters for America and is republished by permission.
Research/Study
Half of LGBTQ+ college faculty considered moving to another state
Half of LGBTQ+ college faculty surveyed have considered moving to another state because of anti-DEI laws the Williams Institute found
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/05/Half-of-LGBTQ-college-faculty-surveyed-have-considered-moving-to-another-state.jpg)
LOS ANGELES – Anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) laws have negatively impacted the teaching, research, and health of LGBTQ+ college faculty, according to a new study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law.
As a result of anti-DEI laws, about half of the LGBTQ+ faculty surveyed (48%) have explored moving to another state, and 20% have actively taken steps to do so. One-third (36%) have considered leaving academia altogether.
Nine states have passed anti-DEI legislation related to higher education, and many others are considering similar legislation.
Using data gathered from 84 LGBTQ+ faculty, most of whom work at public universities, this study examined how the anti-DEI and anti-LGBTQ+ climate has affected their teaching, lives outside the classroom, emotional and physical health, coping strategies, and desire to move.
Many faculty reported that anti-DEI laws have negatively impacted what they teach, how they interact with students, their research on LGBTQ+-related issues, and how out they are on campus and in their communities. More than one in ten faculty surveyed have faced requests for their DEI-related activities from campus administrators (14%), course enrollment declines (12%), and student threats to report them for violating anti-DEI laws (10%).
Nearly three-quarters (74%) of the LGBTQ+ faculty said the current environment has taken a toll on their mental health, and over one-quarter (27%) said it has affected their physical health.
Some LGBTQ+ faculty, particularly those who were tenured, part of a union, or well-respected on campus, have responded to anti-DEI policies by becoming more involved in advocacy and activism on (33%) and off campus (26%). Some made positive changes to their teaching, such as adding readings that provide context for LGBTQ+ content and expanding the amount of discussion during class.
“These findings suggest that anti-DEI laws could lead to significantly fewer out LGBTQ+ faculty, less course coverage of LGBTQ+ topics, and a lack of academic research on LGBTQ+ issues,” said study author Abbie E. Goldberg, Affiliated Scholar at the Williams Institute and Professor of Psychology at Clark University. “This could create a generation of students with less exposure to LGBTQ+ issues and faculty mentorship and support.”
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS:
- About 30% of participants said that their college/university communities were conservative or very conservative on LGBTQ+ issues.6% said that they had experienced harassment or been bothered by supervisors or colleagues due to their LGBTQ+ status, political affiliation, or perceived “wokeness” in the last six months.20% said that they were scared of this type of harassment.
- Nearly 30% of participants said that their home communities were conservative or very conservative on LGBTQ+ issues.5% said that they had experienced harassment or been bothered by neighbors due to their LGBTQ+ status, political affiliation, or perceived “wokeness” in the last six months.37% said that they were scared of this type of harassment.
- Over 60% of survey participants who were parents reported at least one adverse event or change had impacted their children in the past six months, including bullying and harassment (26%), removal of books from classrooms (18%), and curriculum changes (35%).
Read the report here (Link)
Research/Study
Landmark systematic review of trans surgery
Landmark systematic review concluded regret rate for trans surgeries is “remarkably low,” compared to other surgeries & major life decisions
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2023/12/Transitions-LA-Blade.jpg)
By Erin Reed | WASHINGTON – In recent years, anti-transgender activists have used fear of “regret” as justification to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth and restrict it for many adults. Now, a new systematic review published in The American Journal of Surgery has concluded that the rate of regret for transgender surgeries is “remarkably low.”
The review encompasses more than 55 individual studies on regret to support its conclusions and will likely be a powerful tool in challenging transgender bans in the coming weeks.
The study, conducted by experts from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, examines reported regret rates for dozens of surgeries as well as major life decisions and compares them to the regret rates for transgender surgeries.
It finds that “there is lower regret after [gender-affirming surgery], which is less than 1%, than after many other decisions, both surgical and otherwise.” It notes that surgeries such as tubal sterilization, assisted prostatectomy, body contouring, facial rejuvenation, and more all have regret rates more than 10 times as high as gender-affirming surgery.
You can see regret rates for many of the surgeries they examined in the review here:
The review also finds that regret rates for gender-affirming surgeries are lower than those for many life decisions. For instance, the survey found that marriage has a regret rate of 31%, having children has a regret rate of 13%, and at least 72% of sexually active students report regret after engaging in sexual activity at least once. All of these are notably magnitudes higher than gender affirming surgery.
Regret is commonly weaponized against transgender care. The recently released Cass Review, currently being used in an attempt to ban transgender care in England, mentions “regret” 20 times in the document. Pamela Paul’s story in The New York Times features stories of regret heavily and objects to reports of low regret rates. Legislators use the myth of high levels of regret to justify harsh crackdowns on transgender care.
Recently, though, anti-trans activists who have pushed the idea that regret may be high appear to be retreating from their claims. In the WPATH Files, a highly editorialized and error-filled document targeting the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, the authors state that the low levels of regret for transgender people obtaining surgery are actually cause for alarm, and that transgender people are “suspiciously” happy.
The idea that transgender people cannot be trusted to report their own happiness and regret has also been echoed by anti-transgender activists and influencers like Matt Walsh and Jesse Singal.
The review has sharp critiques for those who use claims of “regret” to justify bans on gender affirming care: “Unfortunately, some people seek to limit access to gender-affirming services, most vehemently gender-affirming surgery, and use postoperative regret as reason that care should be denied to all patients. This over-reaching approach erases patient autonomy and does not honor the careful consideration and multidisciplinary approach that goes into making the decision to pursue gender-affirming surgery… [other] operations, while associated with higher rates of post-operative regret, are not as restricted and policed like gender-affirming surgery.”
The review is in line with recent data supporting very low regret rates for transgender people. The 2022 U.S. Transgender Survey, the world’s largest survey of transgender individuals, which surveyed over 90,000 transgender people, found that for those receiving hormone therapy, regret rates are incredibly low: less than 1% report being a little or a lot less satisfied after beginning hormone therapy.
You can view a chart from the 2022 US Transgender Survey showing low rates of regret for hormone therapy here:
There is no evidence that transgender people experience high rates of regret for any transgender care, including transgender surgery. On the contrary, gender-affirming care saves lives.
A Cornell review of more than 51 studies found that gender-affirming care significantly improves the well-being of transgender individuals and also concluded that regret is rare. Low rates of regret for transgender people are not “suspicious.” Rather, they are evidence that the care transgender people seek is important, carefully provided, and helps them live more fulfilled lives.
****************************************************************************
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2023/02/Erin-Reed-600x596.jpg)
Erin Reed is a transgender woman (she/her pronouns) and researcher who tracks anti-LGBTQ+ legislation around the world and helps people become better advocates for their queer family, friends, colleagues, and community. Reed also is a social media consultant and public speaker.
******************************************************************************************
The preceding article was first published at Erin In The Morning and is republished with permission.
Research/Study
90 percent of trans youth live in states restricting their rights
Slightly more than 75% of trans youth live in 40 states passed laws or had pending bills that restrict access to gender-affirming care
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2023/03/20230331_March_for_Queer_and_Trans_Youth_Autonomy_insert_4_c_Washington_Blade_by_Michael_Key.jpg)
LOS ANGELES – According to a new report by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, 93% of transgender youth aged 13 to 17 in the U.S.—approximately 280,300 youth—live in states that have proposed or passed laws restricting their access to health care, sports, school bathrooms and facilities, or the use of gender-affirming pronouns.
In some regions, a large percentage of transgender youth live in a state that has already enacted one of these laws. About 85% of transgender youth in the South and 40% of transgender youth in the Midwest live in one of these states.
An estimated 300,100 youth ages 13 to 17 in the U.S. identify as transgender. Nearly half of transgender youth live in 14 states and Washington D.C. that have laws that protect access to gender-affirming care and prohibit conversion therapy.
All transgender youth living in the Northeast reside in a state with either a gender-affirming care “shield” law or a conversion therapy ban, while almost all transgender youth in the West (97%) live in a state with one or both protective laws.
“For the second straight year, hundreds of bills impacting transgender youth were introduced in state legislatures,” said lead author Elana Redfield, Federal Policy Director at the Williams Institute. “The diverging legal landscape has created a deep divide in the rights and protections for transgender youth and their families across the country.”
KEY FINDINGS:
Restrictive Legislation
Bans on gender-affirming care
237,500 transgender youth—slightly more than three-quarters of transgender youth in the U.S.—live in 40 states that have passed laws or had pending bills that restrict access to gender-affirming care.113,900 transgender youth live in 24 states that have enacted gender-affirming care bans.123,600 youth live in 16 additional states that had a gender-affirming care ban pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
Bans on sports participation
222,500 transgender youth—nearly three-quarters of transgender youth in the U.S.—live in 41 states that have passed laws or had pending bills that restrict participation in school sports.120,200 transgender youth live in 27 states where access to sports participation is restricted or state policy encourages restriction.102,300 transgender youth live in 14 additional states that had a sports ban pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
School bathroom bans
117,000 transgender youth live in 30 states that have passed laws or had pending bills that ban transgender students from using school bathrooms and other facilities that align with their gender identity.38,600 transgender youth live in 13 states that explicitly or implicitly ban bathroom access.78,400 transgender youth live in 17 additional states that had a bathroom ban pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
Bans on pronoun use
121,100 transgender youth live in 31 states that have passed laws or had pending bills that restrict or prohibit the use of gender-affirming pronouns.49,100 transgender youth live in 14 states that have restricted or banned pronoun use, particularly in schools or state-run facilities.72,000 transgender youth live in 17 additional states that had a restriction or prohibition pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
Gender-affirming care “shield” laws
163,800 transgender youth—over half of transgender youth in the U.S.—live in 18 states and D.C. that have passed gender-affirming care “shield” laws or had pending bills that protect access to care.146,700 transgender youth live in 14 states and D.C. that have passed these protections.17,100 transgender youth live in four additional states that had a “shield” law pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
Conversion therapy bans
204,800 transgender youth live in 31 states and D.C. that ban conversion therapy or had pending bills that prohibit the practice for minors.198,000 transgender youth—about two-thirds of transgender youth in the U.S.—live in 27 states and D.C. that ban conversion therapy for minors.6,800 transgender youth live in four additional states that had a ban pending in the 2024 legislative session. |
“A growing body of research shows that efforts to support transgender youth are associated with better mental health,” said co-author Kerith Conron, Research Director at the Williams Institute. “Restrictions on medically appropriate care and full participation at school exacerbate the stress experienced by these youth and their families.” |
Read the report: (Here)
Research/Study
Same-sex couples vulnerable to negative effects of climate change
Same-sex couple households disproportionately live in coastal areas, cities & areas with poorer infrastructure and less access to resources
![](https://www.losangelesblade.com/content/files/2024/04/FEMA-Worker-surveys-flood-damages-Spring-2024-NE-US.jpg)
LOS ANGELES – A new report by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds that same-sex couples are at greater risk of experiencing the adverse effects of climate change compared to different-sex couples.
LGBTQ people in same-sex couple households disproportionately live in coastal areas and cities and areas with poorer infrastructure and less access to resources, making them more vulnerable to climate hazards.
Using U.S. Census data and climate risk assessment data from NASA and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), researchers conducted a geographic analysis to assess the climate risk impacting same-sex couples. NASA’s risk assessment focuses on changes to meteorological patterns, infrastructure and built environment, and the presence of at-risk populations. FEMA’s assessment focuses on changes in the occurrence of severe weather events, accounting for at-risk populations, the availability of services, and access to resources.
Results show counties with a higher proportion of same-sex couples are, on average, at increased risk from environmental, infrastructure, and social vulnerabilities due to climate change.
“Given the disparate impact of climate change on LGBTQ populations, climate change policies, including disaster preparedness, response, and recovery plans, must address the specific needs and vulnerabilities facing LGBTQ people,” said study co-author Ari Shaw, Senior Fellow and Director of International Programs at the Williams Institute. “Policies should focus on mitigating discriminatory housing and urban development practices, making shelters safe spaces for LGBT people, and ensuring that relief aid reaches displaced LGBTQ individuals and families.”
“Factors underlying the geographic vulnerability are crucial to understanding why same-sex couples are threatened by climate change and whether the findings in our study apply to the broader LGBTQ population,” said study co-author Lindsay Mahowald, Research Data Analyst at the Williams Institute. “More research is needed to examine how disparities in housing, employment, and health care among LGBT people compound the geographic vulnerabilities to climate change.”
Read the report
-
Los Angeles4 days ago
DTLA Proud Festival 2024 closes out the summer in new “Gayborhood” location
-
Orange County3 days ago
Orange County Program Trains Businesses to Welcome Transgender Workers
-
National5 days ago
A trans president? March organizer dares to dream
-
World5 days ago
Out in the World: LGBTQ news
-
News3 days ago
Los Angeles Blade announces strategic partnership with leading SoCal LatinX media CALÓ News
-
Commentary2 days ago
Elect Kamala Harris — for all the people
-
Special3 days ago
Los Angeles Blade is hiring a local News Editor
-
Africa3 days ago
Queer Kenyans decry homophobia in churches
-
News11 hours ago
Los Angeles Blade among winners at 2024 California Ethnic Media Award